The roadmap nobody ships.
The AI initiative everyone believes in, still waiting behind the quarter. A year of decks, nothing in production.
Your next stage of growth needs more than advice. I help founder-led, mission-driven companies clarify the offer, improve the product, and build what comes next.
Start with a free Field Report, ship one defined outcome in a Case Sprint, or bring me alongside your team in the Seat.
Every growing organization carries at least one. See if yours is on the wall.
The AI initiative everyone believes in, still waiting behind the quarter. A year of decks, nothing in production.
The positioning was written two funding rounds ago. The product moved on, and the market can't tell.
Prospects who see it live, buy. The site can't make the same argument on its own.
Customers buy convinced and renew unsure. Time to value stretches, adoption stalls, and both GRR and NRR quietly pay the bill.
Customers arrive expecting one thing, the product delivers another, and your CX team inherits the gap.
Customers keep asking for something. Between ticket volume, thin discovery, and no system for reading the signal, the roadmap keeps guessing.
The team ships real value and the market shrugs. No rhythm inside, no splash outside, no story carrying the work.
More product managers, more process, less shipping. The AI era wants builders and a betting table, not backlog administrators.
Every meeting ends with it, and the honest answer so far is a shrug with slides. You need an answer that's real, specific, and yours.
Cases like these are often the result of accumulation. The solution is purposeful design.
Choose a Case Sprint when you have a specific problem or need a high-quality deliverable quickly. We define the outcome first, fix the scope and price, and ship in one to four weeks.
Speed without the usual tradeoff.
Twenty years across brand, product, design, and AI means fewer handoffs, less translation, and no junior team. You get senior thinking and finished work at a fraction of the time and cost of a traditional firm.
When the company has outgrown the way it looks, sounds, or explains its value.
When the offer is hard to buy, leaves revenue behind, or no longer matches the product.
When you need to prove, improve, or ship an AI-enabled product quickly.
When the team has more process but less clarity, speed, or connection to the market.
When the digital experience no longer reflects the quality of the organization behind it.
The Case Sprint is bounded. The Seat is embedded. Choose the Seat when the problem needs ongoing investigation, diagnosis, design, and delivery inside your working rhythm.
Compare the two →I started in design and never left it. I just kept widening what it applies to, following the problems into harder rooms. I established a brand system for Florida's leading hospital, built products for companies like Google and Cisco, led an EdTech company through its exit to Pluralsight, and spent the last six years as the product and design operator for a nonprofit fundraising platform, helping carry it from a single CRM into an AI-forward platform trusted by thousands of organizations.
Along the way I've never been limited to a single perspective. Brand, design, marketing, product, engineering: I come at a problem from whatever discipline the case requires, because the hardest problems never stay in one lane.
Give me the problem. I investigate the product, offer, experience, and operation, then deliver the findings and my recommendation on video. No pitch and no obligation.
That line is Holmes's, and he added that very few people ever practice it. He was right about consultants too. I wrote a book, Three Pipe Problems, about working the hardest cases this way, and every engagement in this practice runs on the same three moves.
Before anything gets built, we define what solved looks like: the number a board actually watches, moved, and the story that should be true two quarters from now. We name it together, in writing, before the work begins.
From that outcome, we work out what has to be true to reach it, which lever moves first, and in what order. Only then do we choose what to build. Strategy before software, so you never ship a feature to solve a problem no feature can reach.
A simple dashboard tied to the number, from the first week. Evidence, not enthusiasm. At any point in the engagement, you know whether the case is closing. So do I.
We reason backwards from the closed case, then build forward to it
Most companies don't need more opinions. They need someone to find out what's actually true, and then build accordingly.
This is creative work in service of revenue, not the other way around. The cases I take are the ones that move the numbers a board actually watches:
The Field Report helps us choose the right way to work.
You know the problem or deliverable.
You want a strong answer quickly. We agree on the outcome, scope, price, and sprint window before I begin. I lead the work and ship the deliverable.
The problem needs ongoing work alongside the team.
You want an embedded operator across investigation, diagnosis, design, and delivery. I join the working rhythm, help make the decisions, and build with your team.
There are two ways in, and the door is the same. For almost everyone the best first step is the free Field Report: a real investigation of your operation, no cost and no obligation, and the fastest way to see how I work before you commit to anything. If you already know you want more, a Case Sprint or the Seat, or you simply want to reach me directly, you're in the right place too.
For a Case Sprint, the Seat, or anything else, get in touch below.
The Field Report is free. Case Sprints are fixed-scope and usually range from $5,000 to $15,000 depending on the outcome and what needs to ship. The Seat usually starts around $5,000 a month.
Because it's how every case should start, and most firms charge five figures for a worse version of it. The Field Report is the investigation the method demands, and it's the fastest way for both of us to know whether this is my kind of case. I take a handful each month, I do the work personally, and the findings are yours whatever you decide.
No, though the looks come with it. In this practice, design means the deliberate act of working backwards from an outcome to the thing that produces it. A positioning gets designed. An onboarding gets designed. An AI system, a launch, an operating model: designed or accumulated, those are the only two options, and most companies are running on accumulation. I also do the visual craft, at a level most consultancies can't, but that's the last mile of the work.
Most fractional roles advise from the sidelines. I investigate like a detective and build like an operator, and I keep the practice deliberately small so it stays that way.
Prototypes, AI features and workflows, positioning and messaging systems, product surfaces, and the occasional site. If your customers touch it or your team runs on it, I've probably built one.
Yes, and gladly. The goal is always to leave your team stronger and faster than I found them.
Because the work is better this way. A small number of companies, chosen carefully, with enough of my attention to actually close the case.