The roadmap nobody ships.
The AI initiative everyone believes in, still waiting behind the quarter. A year of decks, nothing in production.
For two decades I've been obsessed with using design, technology, and AI to solve problems that matter. For the last five years I led product and design at Virtuous, serving thousands of nonprofit organizations. Now my practice is open: everything I've learned across brand, design, product, marketing, and AI, brought to bear for a small number of mission-driven software companies. Bring me the problem that's resisted everything else. I'll investigate it like a detective, then build the fix alongside your team.
Real work ships at every milestone, or you don't pay.
Every growth-stage software company carries at least one. See if yours is on the wall.
The AI initiative everyone believes in, still waiting behind the quarter. A year of decks, nothing in production.
The positioning was written two funding rounds ago. The product moved on, and the market can't tell.
Prospects who see it live, buy. The site can't make the same argument on its own.
Customers buy convinced and renew unsure. Time to value stretches, adoption stalls, and both GRR and NRR quietly pay the bill.
Customers arrive expecting one thing, the product delivers another, and your CX team inherits the gap.
Customers keep asking for something. Between ticket volume, thin discovery, and no system for reading the signal, the roadmap keeps guessing.
The team ships real value and the market shrugs. No rhythm inside, no splash outside, no story carrying the work.
More product managers, more process, less shipping. The AI era wants builders and a betting table, not backlog administrators.
Every meeting ends with it, and the honest answer so far is a shrug with slides. You need an answer that's real, specific, and yours.
Cases like these are often the result of accumulation. The solution is purposeful design.
Most consultants sell a discipline. I take the whole case, and the work usually lands in one of six shapes. Every one of them ends with something your customers touch or your team runs on, not a document about it. The six look like different disciplines, but they're one act. A positioning, an AI system, an operating model: different materials, same craft, each one designed from the outcome back.
I started in design and never left it. I just kept widening what it applies to, following the problems into harder rooms. I established a brand system for Florida's leading hospital, built products for companies like Google and Cisco, led an EdTech company through its exit to Pluralsight, and spent the last six years as the product and design executive for a nonprofit fundraising platform, helping carry it from a single CRM into an AI-forward platform trusted by thousands of organizations.
Along the way I've never been limited to a single perspective. Brand, design, marketing, product, engineering: I come at a problem from whatever discipline the case requires, because the hardest problems never stay in one lane.
Some of what I shipped in the last year alone, hands on the work, AI-native throughout:
That combination is the offer.
Not a strategist who leaves before the work starts, and not just a builder who needs the answer handed to him.
Holmes didn't guess, he deduced. He gathered his facts first, and half the time the case was solved before he left the armchair. That is the Field Report: a real investigation of your product, your funnel, your story, and your systems, before you've spent a dollar. It costs nothing and obligates nothing, and it is the fastest way to see how I work.
A short set of questions in your own words: what you're seeing, what you've tried, where it hurts most. About fifteen minutes, and you can pause anytime.
Thirty minutes, you and me. No deck and no pitch. I'll ask the questions your statement raises, and you'll know within the half hour whether I understand your world.
Then I go to work on my own time. I pressure-test how your product actually works, walk your site and funnel the way a first-time buyer would, read your positioning against your market, and look hard at where AI could earn its keep.
Findings ranked by likely impact, evidenced, and tied to the number you most want to move. Delivered in writing with a video walkthrough, personal and specific to you, along with one honest recommendation about what, if anything, to do next. It's yours to keep whatever you decide.
That line is Holmes's, and he added that very few people ever practice it. He was right about consultants too. I wrote a book, Three Pipe Problems, about working the hardest cases this way, and every engagement in this practice runs on the same three moves.
Before anything gets built, we define what solved looks like: the number a board actually watches, moved, and the story that should be true two quarters from now. We name it together, in writing, before the work begins.
From that outcome, we work out what has to be true to reach it, which lever moves first, and in what order. Only then do we choose what to build. Strategy before software, so you never ship a feature to solve a problem no feature can reach.
A simple dashboard tied to the number, from the first week. Evidence, not enthusiasm. At any point in the engagement, you know whether the case is closing. So do I.
We reason backwards from the closed case, then build forward to it
Most companies don't need more opinions. They need someone to find out what's actually true, and then build accordingly.
This is creative work in service of revenue, not the other way around. The cases I take are the ones that move the numbers a board actually watches:
Every case begins with the free Field Report. When it points to work worth doing, there are two ways to do it, both priced by the case, both fixed before we start, and both ending with something shipped.
A real investigation of your product, your funnel, your story, and your systems, before you've spent a dollar. Findings ranked by likely impact, delivered in writing with a personal video walkthrough, and one honest recommendation about what, if anything, to do next. It's how almost every case here begins.
Free
One defined problem, taken from decision to shipped. An AI feature in production, a repositioning carried through product and site, an onboarding rebuilt end to end, a launch done right. Fixed scope and fixed price, agreed against the outcome before we start, usually closed inside a quarter, with my hands on the work alongside your team.
Priced by the case
An operating partner on standing terms, shaped to what the company needs. That might be counsel: a weekly working session, async review of anything, a voice in the decisions that matter. Or it might be embedded: a day or two each week inside the company, building. The shape can change as the company does.
From $7,500/mo
Every price is set up front, invoiced simply, and covered by the same four guarantees below.
In writing, up front, and the same for every case.
Every engagement is built around real milestones. Something real ships at each one, or you don't pay.
The work moves in stages. You see progress at every one, and you can stop at any of them.
A simple dashboard tied to the number we named, from the first week.
If your case isn't mine to take, I'll say so in the first conversation and point you toward people I trust.
I could run this practice for any software company, and I'm choosing the ones that build for the mission-driven world. Part of that is credibility: I know your buyer with a depth no generalist can match, because I've spent my career living with their budgets, their boards, and the way they actually make decisions. Mostly, though, it's conviction. The tools that serve the servers deserve the best product thinking available, and this is the work I've dedicated my career to. The book calls it designing for the other side of the screen, and this practice is that idea carried into harder rooms.
So the practice gives back by design. A portion of every engagement funds pro bono cases for nonprofits. As your product gets sharper, an organization that could never afford this kind of help receives it free.
There are two ways in, and the door is the same. For almost everyone the best first step is the free Field Report: a real investigation of your operation, no cost and no obligation, and the fastest way to see how I work before you commit to anything. If you already know you want more, The Case or The Seat, or you simply want to reach me directly, you're in the right place too.
For The Case, The Seat, or anything else, get in touch below.
The Field Report is always free. The Case is priced against the outcome, most start from $7,500 and up, always scoped and aligned with you before we start. The Seat starts at $7,500 a month depending on standing counsel or embedded needs. Every paid engagement carries the same guarantee: real work ships at every milestone, or you don't pay.
Because it's how every case should start, and most firms charge five figures for a worse version of it. The Field Report is the investigation the method demands, and it's the fastest way for both of us to know whether this is my kind of case. I take a handful each month, I do the work personally, and the findings are yours whatever you decide.
No, though the looks come with it. In this practice, design means the deliberate act of working backwards from an outcome to the thing that produces it. A positioning gets designed. An onboarding gets designed. An AI system, a launch, an operating model: designed or accumulated, those are the only two options, and most companies are running on accumulation. I also do the visual craft, at a level most consultancies can't, but that's the last mile of the work.
Most fractional roles advise from the sidelines. I investigate like a detective and build like an operator, and I keep the practice deliberately small so it stays that way.
Prototypes, AI features and workflows, positioning and messaging systems, product surfaces, and the occasional site. If your customers touch it or your team runs on it, I've probably built one.
Yes, and gladly. The goal is always to leave your team stronger and faster than I found them.
Because the work is better this way. A small number of companies, chosen carefully, with enough of my attention to actually close the case.